Huo [Zhuge Liang, styled Kongming] (
getsomesleep) wrote2011-02-20 01:57 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
十 六 ; shí liù
I should like to assure all those who wonder that the contents of the text over my head do not in any way reflect my thoughts, despite appearance to the contrary. Poor diction aside, I cannot imagine why I should invest so much though in wondering what color of hat would best suit each man or woman I meet; nor do I actually mean to set anyone on fire, in case someone sees any reason to credit that accusation.
My utmost apologies for the inevitable distraction.
-- 火
My utmost apologies for the inevitable distraction.
-- 火
no subject
I'm sure I could make it take only a few minutes; it would be a very thorough inspection.
no subject
You could not and I am sure that we are misunderstanding what Huo meant because he would not imply that I am sure!
no subject
Mmm, well, you could ask him what he means.
But I don't think I've been unclear in my meaning. I'll play 'doctor' or 'nurse' or whatever you prefer.
no subject
Maybe I should not ask.
How would you pl I thought you were inspe You have not been unclear and it would take more than a few minutes!
no subject
I think you should.
So you'll let me inspect you?
no subject
I think I might get an answer I would not like and so I would be better off not asking.
...yes.
no subject
But you might like it. And he couldn't be any worse than me.
Good. How would you like me?
no subject
In the room. Dressed.
How do youI will say more in person?no subject
But I doubt he could give me a run for my money--unless you choose to loan him a bed and your towel for his bookshelf.
Not even a teaser here to entice me?
no subject
Examining me.
no subject
mm, I'll be there in a bit.
no subject
A bit?
I thought you were implying that I hadThat goes against what we both know you were implying! My point will be proven then!no subject
Whatever. I just don't want to cause you to finish too soon.
no subject
I DO NOT.
Maybe the firno subject
Sure, sure. If you say so.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
That is not what I meant!
no subject
no subject
[The writing stops.]
The opposite of what? What is being implied? There is too much implication! In everything!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
Double entendre? What double entendre?
/doesn't even try to resist
LOL. YAY NOT RESISTING
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
stuck out only enough to be considered visibly 'struck through'--still very readable
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)